Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but both of them have the same thickness. The Galaxy A60 has a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a little longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size. The HTC U Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A60 count with really similar cameras, because although the HTC U Ultra has a camera with a lot lower resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.