Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. The Galaxy A60 is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the LG G7 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A60 has older 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 16 mega pixels back camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.