Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-06-20 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than the LG Q8, having a score of 82.3 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a heavier cellphone than the LG Q8, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has older 11 version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better performance than LG Q8, because it has a higher number of cores (although they are slower) and more RAM. The LG Q8 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixels count per inch of screen.
The LG Q8 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates, a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Q8 also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
LG Q8 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A60 features just a bit better battery lifetime than LG Q8, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.