Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, getting an 82.5 score against 82.3. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is older than the Samsung Galaxy A60, it's construction is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better screen density.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A60 has just a little better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
LG V30S ThinQ's camera is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A60 one, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video quality and a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.