Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. The Galaxy A60 is a newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A60. They have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.