Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 82.3 score against 81.2. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Although Samsung Galaxy A60 and the LG V40 ThinQ were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy A60's construction is just a little bit thicker but also just a little bit lighter than the LG V40 ThinQ.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A60. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A60, because it has a better pixels density, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger camera aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A60 has a bit better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.