Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, getting an 86.3 score against 82.3. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A60, but it is a little heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A60 features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.