Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A60's 82.3 global score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11 version, giving some extra features. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than Samsung Galaxy A60, it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy A60 has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture, a lot higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.