Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than Moto G9 Play, getting a score of 82.3 against 76.7. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the newer 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy A60 is older than Moto G9 Play, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A60 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G9 Play features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A60 features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A60 also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto G9 Play counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G9 Play features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.