Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a general score of 82.3 against 75.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a a lot newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Moto Z Force features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola Moto Z Force features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity. Moto Z Force shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z Force also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.