Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A60's construction is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (although slower).
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a camera with a way better 21 MP resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.