Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 82.3 score against 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A60 is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A60 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.