Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the Moto Z3, getting an 82.3 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a newer phone than Moto Z3, but it's a little bit heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Moto Z3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A60, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Moto Z3 counts with a display that's very similar to the Galaxy A60 one, although the Moto Z3 has a little bit smaller display, a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A60 also has a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a way more MP camera and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.