Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting an 82.3 score against 76.3. Even though Galaxy A60 is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's just a little heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A60 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a little higher display pixels density, a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.