Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a a bit lighter and a bit thinner device than Motorola One Vision, although both were released only 1 months apart. Motorola One Vision features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy A60, and although the Motorola One Vision has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola One Vision also has a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola One Vision has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot better resolution camera and a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola One Vision has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.