Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 409 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A60 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.