Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, getting a global score of 90.7 against 82.3. The Galaxy A52 body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A60. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A60. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A60 and Galaxy A52 both feature quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.