Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A60's 82.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy A60's, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A60, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.