Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a general score of 82.3 against 80.4. The Galaxy A60 is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.