Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a score of 82.3 against 77.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a a little bit thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Note3, but both weight 5.93oz.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite higher screen pixels density, a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A60 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
Galaxy A60 features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A60 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A60 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a better 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a much larger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy A60 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.