Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A60's 82.3 overall score. Even being the best we are comparing, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way heavier and thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A60. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A60, because it has a little greater screen density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution, a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot higher video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.