Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A60, having a 95.4 score against 82.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A60, but it's much heavier and thicker. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy A60, because it has a little greater pixels quantity per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy A60 feature quite similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with way more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.