Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A60, having a global score of 82.6 against 82.3. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A60. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen. Galaxy S25's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy A60 one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.