Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Galaxy A60's general score of 82.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy A60 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is incredibly lighter and much thinner than Galaxy A60.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A60, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.