Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-06-20 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, having a global score of 82.3 against 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy A60 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy S6 Active features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A60 features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality pictures, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.