Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a much newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A60 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores (although slower) and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A60 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A60 also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features improved battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.