Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 82.3 against 80.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A60 is older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is extremely lighter and noticeably thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy A60 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 32% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.