Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should count with very similar OS features. The Galaxy A60 is a way lighter and way thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were released with only 8 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro count with quite similar screens, both have the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a same size display and the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh. The Galaxy A60 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way lower 16 mega pixels resolution back camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.