Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, having a general score of 88.5 against 82.3. The Galaxy Z Flip body is a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A60, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11, giving some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better display than Galaxy A60, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a little higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A60, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, a smaller camera aperture and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor.
Galaxy A60 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.