Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A60's 82.3 score. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A60's, although it is a lot heavier.
Galaxy A60 and Galaxy Z Fold 2 have quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low light environments, a lower video resolution and a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.