Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is better than Galaxy A60's global score of 82.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is noticeably heavier but notably thinner than the Galaxy A60. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has newer 14 version while Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
Galaxy A60 has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184px.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.