Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 82.3 score against 79. The Galaxy A60 is a notably thinner device than Xperia XZ2 Compact, but both of them weight 5.93oz. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A60 has older 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a sharper screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photos, a back camera with more megapixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy A60 features just a bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.