Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Xperia XZs, with a score of 82.3 against 77.2. Galaxy A60 is a a lot newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Xperia XZs, although it is a little bit heavier. Galaxy A60 features a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and more RAM.
Xperia XZs features a display that is very similar to the Galaxy A60 one, because although the Xperia XZs has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The Sony Xperia XZs takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a better resolution camera, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and better video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has more memory to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A60 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.