Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A60, getting an 87.9 score against 82.3. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy A60 has Android 11. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a newer cellphone than Galaxy A60, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy A60 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro feature similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have equal internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.