Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a overall score of 82.3 against 77.2. Although the Galaxy A60 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro were released only 7 months apart, the Galaxy A60 is just a little lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A60 has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A60 has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit worse screen pixel density, they both have a display of the same size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with slightly more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
The Galaxy A60 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations, a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.