Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy A60 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A60 is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 48% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.