Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's overall score of 79. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you identical OS features. The Galaxy A60 body is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, despite of the fact that it was released only 10 months before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A60 features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.