Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), with a general score of 84.9 against 72.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro construction is notably newer than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, although it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen, a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite bigger display.
IPhone 11 Pro has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) counts with a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. IPhone 11 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.