Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting an 84.5 score against 72.8. IPhone XS Max's design is much newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS Max counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a just a little greater pixels number in each screen inch, a larger screen and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688. The Apple iPhone XS Max captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
The iPhone XS Max features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A7 (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.