Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), although it's a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V50 ThinQ features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a higher display density and a bigger screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.