Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a 76.4 score against 72.8. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is older, just a little heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2016). The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A7 (2016) features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery life than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.