Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a 77.9 score against 72.8. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), we must highlight that it's also an older, much thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels density. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.