Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 401 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), with a global score of 79.2 against 72.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is way newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A7 (2016) has a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A7 (2016) features an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.