Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. Even though the vivo X60 Pro is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), it is a little heavier and just a little thicker. The vivo X60 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a larger display. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture. The vivo X60 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.