Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-12-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit (Single-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a 76.4 score against 69.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A7 (2016) has Android 5.1 version. Even being the best we compare here, the Motorola Droid Turbo design is older, way thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A7 (2016).
Motorola Droid Turbo has a better performing processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a graphics processing unit and 3 more processing cores. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher resolution back camera. The Galaxy A7 (2016) counts with a better storage to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has only 16 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.