Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), getting an 87.6 score against 75.8. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), it is somewhat thicker and heavier. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a lot higher video resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.