Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with a global score of 76.4 against 75.8. Motorola Droid Turbo's body is just a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), although it's notably thicker and was released 2 years before. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher screen pixel density.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an 8% more battery capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.