Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a 77.9 score against 75.8. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo is extremely older and incredibly thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2017), it's construction is still just a little lighter. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.