Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a general score of 81.2 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's just a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger display, a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture. Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.