Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017), having a 77.8 score against 75.8. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is notably newer and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, but it is somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite higher pixel density, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a way bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.